Luca does this impossibly cute thing lately. He'll ask me questions.
Mama? You like the giant? he asks as he stops what's he doing, genuinely interested in my response.
Sure. I guess. Giants are pretty cool. (I'm not sure which Giant to whom he is referring, but, in my desire to never discriminate, I'm comfortable with all extra extra tall/large people. So, why the hell not. I like the Giant.)
Me like the Giant too, he says, relieved. Happy. Content.
Mama? Do you like Pete? (from Mickey Mouse) Again, he sits poised. Head cocked. Waiting....
Yup. He's pretty great too. I like Pete, I say. A bit disinterested but with enough enthusiasm to wonder whether I've encouraged the questioning or shut it down with engaged finality. Hoping in a way for the latter.
Me like Pete too. He sighs happily. He's taking refuge in our similarities. Our sameness. Our found mutual interests.
Mama? You like the wizard? (from a game the kids play)
Uh huh. The wizard is pretty groovy. I like scarves and people who choose to follow their true talents. So, the wizard is likable.
Me like him too.
And on and on we can go. With Luca questioning me, and me answering. All the while he is reaffirmed that everything is right in the world, because his beloved mama thinks the same thing that he does.
I see his shoulders relax a bit when I answer as he would. I see this smile crawl onto his cheeks, bearing this grin that is really noteworthy.
But what happens when he begins to ask heavier questions in which I don't share his same feelings? What happens when I know that what I will say will make him feel a division from me, rather than that unbelievably comforting feeling of similarity? What happens when we're not talking about giants and wizards?
As a parent, the first thing I want to see in my child is an infectious grin, a great sigh of relief as he discovers all they ways we are united. As a parent, I want to strengthen that invisible tie between us.
But, as a thinker, and one whose greatest desire is to raise critical thinkers, the first thing I want to see in my children is their ability to own their beliefs - own their opinions - regardless of how others will perceive them. I want to see them take on difference as an opportunity, not a threat. I want them to see that my love for them far transcends our opinions, our beliefs, our values. My love for them is without boundaries. I want them to see that what I think really doesn't matter.
I know as Luca ages a bit, his questions will turn deeper and I'll have to face that expectant little stance knowing that I will disappoint him at times. I may answer and prove myself not to be the woman he always wanted as a mom, or thought I to be. I just hope that he'll begin to find comfort internally and that my response will only be secondary. Just an interesting tidbit to ponder, but not something for which to hold his breath. I know his questions for me will begin to stretch.
Mama? Why do you like the giant? Have you always liked the giant?
And in this way, we can create a closeness out of understanding, not necessarily similarity.
As I've gotten older, I have found great divisions in the way I think and some very dear loved ones. But it isn't a threat or a problem, rather a small side note. Relationships by very nature are determined by peoples ability to see beyond most small side notes.
Sameness doesn't cause that crazy burning sensation of affection I have for my most prized friends and family. No. Not at all. It's respect, and genuine love. Some of my nearest and dearest sit on opposite ends of the spectrum from me. While this can make for some uncomfortable dinner parties, it only manages to make me love them even more. Because as I'm walking away, somewhat shaky at times in my proclamations, I know that I am still loved by them. I know that our differences will never sever a bond that runs so deep.
Keep asking Luca Lane and I'll keep answering, with all the love and respect in my heart. I can't promise much, but I can promise that.
Monday, January 30, 2012
Friday, January 27, 2012
Nesting
Sunday, January 22, 2012
All day and all night
Meryl
Have I mentioned that I am in love with Meryl Streep? I am. Openly. Totally. Completely.
She is on the cover of this month's Vogue and when I flipped to this page, and saw this photo, I felt a stirring deep inside.
Something about the beauty and simplicity of the pose. The moment.
I see a woman who is smart and accomplished. Brave. Talented. I see a woman I would like to be like.
Eat your heart out young Hollywood. True beauty reigns.
She is on the cover of this month's Vogue and when I flipped to this page, and saw this photo, I felt a stirring deep inside.
Something about the beauty and simplicity of the pose. The moment.
I see a woman who is smart and accomplished. Brave. Talented. I see a woman I would like to be like.
Eat your heart out young Hollywood. True beauty reigns.
Friday, January 20, 2012
Poverty
Whose problem is poverty?
Good question. One which Richard Rothstein tries to answer in his book of the same name. A friend sent a fascinating blog entry about equity in schools, and the author quotes Rothstein. I feel compelled to share it. (See below for link to blog)
If you send two groups of students to equally high-quality schools, the group with greater socioeconomic disadvantage will necessarily have lower average achievement than the more fortunate group.
Why is this so? Because low-income children often have no health insurance and therefore no routine preventive medical and dental care, leading to more school absences as a result of illness. Children in low-income families are more prone to asthma, resulting in more sleeplessness, irritability, and lack of exercise. They experience lower birth weight as well as more lead poisoning and iron-deficiency anemia, each of which leads to diminished cognitive ability and more behavior problems. Their families frequently fall behind in rent and move, so children switch schools more often, losing continuity of instruction.
Poor children are, in general, not read to aloud as often or exposed to complex language and large vocabularies. Their parents have low-wage jobs and are more frequently laid off, causing family stress and more arbitrary discipline. The neighborhoods through which these children walk to school and in which they play have more crime and drugs and fewer adult role models with professional careers. Such children are more often in single-parent families and so get less adult attention. They have fewer cross-country trips, visits to museums and zoos, music or dance lessons, and organized sports leagues to develop their ambition, cultural awareness, and self-confidence.
Each of these disadvantages makes only a small contribution to the achievement gap, but cumulatively, they explain a lot.
http://crookedtimber.org/2009/05/05/more-on-equity-and-equality-in-education/
We so often simplify the issue of poverty. We so often think it can be fixed with a breakfast program or with in school health clinics. We think we can dress it differently. We think if we teach hard enough, if we love more than we thought possible, the achievement gap will just dissolve. I have sat in interviews with aspiring teachers who have said exactly this when posed with the question of how they will try to lessen that big canyon dividing the children of our country. They have told me, with wide eyes and earnest faces, that they just believe with enough heart, the gap will melt.
But it won't. You can't wish poverty away. Or love it away. Or teach it away. You can't ignore it away. Or pretend it away. It exists and it's very real.
So whose problem is it?
It's all of ours.
Good question. One which Richard Rothstein tries to answer in his book of the same name. A friend sent a fascinating blog entry about equity in schools, and the author quotes Rothstein. I feel compelled to share it. (See below for link to blog)
If you send two groups of students to equally high-quality schools, the group with greater socioeconomic disadvantage will necessarily have lower average achievement than the more fortunate group.
Why is this so? Because low-income children often have no health insurance and therefore no routine preventive medical and dental care, leading to more school absences as a result of illness. Children in low-income families are more prone to asthma, resulting in more sleeplessness, irritability, and lack of exercise. They experience lower birth weight as well as more lead poisoning and iron-deficiency anemia, each of which leads to diminished cognitive ability and more behavior problems. Their families frequently fall behind in rent and move, so children switch schools more often, losing continuity of instruction.
Poor children are, in general, not read to aloud as often or exposed to complex language and large vocabularies. Their parents have low-wage jobs and are more frequently laid off, causing family stress and more arbitrary discipline. The neighborhoods through which these children walk to school and in which they play have more crime and drugs and fewer adult role models with professional careers. Such children are more often in single-parent families and so get less adult attention. They have fewer cross-country trips, visits to museums and zoos, music or dance lessons, and organized sports leagues to develop their ambition, cultural awareness, and self-confidence.
Each of these disadvantages makes only a small contribution to the achievement gap, but cumulatively, they explain a lot.
http://crookedtimber.org/2009/05/05/more-on-equity-and-equality-in-education/
We so often simplify the issue of poverty. We so often think it can be fixed with a breakfast program or with in school health clinics. We think we can dress it differently. We think if we teach hard enough, if we love more than we thought possible, the achievement gap will just dissolve. I have sat in interviews with aspiring teachers who have said exactly this when posed with the question of how they will try to lessen that big canyon dividing the children of our country. They have told me, with wide eyes and earnest faces, that they just believe with enough heart, the gap will melt.
But it won't. You can't wish poverty away. Or love it away. Or teach it away. You can't ignore it away. Or pretend it away. It exists and it's very real.
So whose problem is it?
It's all of ours.
Monday, January 9, 2012
Perspective
Friday, January 6, 2012
Another one down
Tuesday, January 3, 2012
A New Year
I love the idea of fresh starts. Endless possibilities. I remember when I was trying to get pregnant, the onset of my period would seem to some to be the most devastating time of the month. And it usually was, but only for a moment or two. Then, I would have this incredible sense of hope. It was a new month. A clean start. I would carefully mark my calendar with big marker letters. DAY ONE. I knew I would hit a low later in the month as anxiety would build and doubt would flood, but for that day, the potential of a new chapter buoyed me so high. That's what's tricky about cycles, whether they be menstrual, moon, academic or otherwise; along with the end is a new beginning just waiting to be begun. You're mourning a loss but also celebrating an arrival. And how I love contradictory feelings.
We had some of our nearest and dearest over for a New Year celebration and inevitably, the conversation folded around to resolutions. I always struggle with what to resolve. I don't like choosing something that requires inordinate amounts of time. Or money. Or space. I don't want my resolution to require a membership somewhere or a big piece of exercise equipment. I like to choose something that I can put into practice on a quiet Thursday night if I'm feeling like a change is in order. You can't run a faster mile in your pjs. And you can't become a better cook when a trip to the store and a stock pile of recipes are needed. But there are ways to better yourself on those late nights.
I mumbled something about trying to be better. "I want to be a better partner, a more attentive one" I said as we ate Indian food and sipped wine. Our kids demand our attention. So does work. And even our friends to some degree. They call, leave messages, Facebook us. But our partners often are quiet about their needs. Or they are quite vocal but we feel comfortable enough with them to ask them to wait. While this is something I want to work on, it felt a bit broad. It was something that I wanted to keep in the forefront of my mind at all times but it wasn't necessarily resolution material. I feel I'm a pretty darn good partner on a lot of days so demanding perfection of myself is exactly what a resolution shouldn't be. It was all I had in the moment though.
And then my friend said it. "I want to show up. That's it. That's my resolution."
Bingo.
I loved it. We talked all about how the phrase, "Be present" is so overused that it has actually become something I need to be poked at while I'm supposedly practicing it. But "show up" just feels different somehow. It feels manageable but also pretty daunting. I love that it takes into consideration that on different days, your level of arrival will feel differently. Some days, you'll be the first one there - dressed, showered and eager. And other days, you'll be the one that shows up in sweats asking what day it is. But you arrived, and that's the important part.
So here I am 2012 . I've arrived. My energy is a bit low at this exact moment but I suspect after this coffee break I'll feel ready to tackle the world again. I know I won't be the perfect wife, mom, friend, sister or daughter this year. In fact, I know some days will be downright ugly. But I resolve to show up. I resolve to give what I can.
| The four musketeers toasting to a new year. With apple juice. |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
